The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALEXANDER JAN CAREL DE VRIES, ARMIN HERBERT EMIL AUGUST
OLSCHEWSKI, JOHN HOWARD TRIPP and PIETER MARTIN LUGT
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0355
Application No. 10/080,714
____________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 8, 2005
____________
Before MCQUADE, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2 and
4-6, which are all of the claims pending in this application. The proposed amendment
filed with the reply brief (Paper No. 18) has not been entered (see Paper No. 19).
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007