Appeal No. 2005-0359
Application No. 09/333,917
of conductive fillers, and the sum of conductive fillers being
limited to <50% by wt.;
(G) 0-92% by wt. of other fillers, based on the sum of
(A)-(G), where the sum of (F) + (G) is limited to ≤93% by wt. and
fillers between 20 and 50 µm are limited to ≤30% by wt. and those
below 20 µm to ≤10% by wt,;
(H) ≤15% by wt., based on the sum of (A)-(E) and (H), of
solvents. (Column 1, lines 6-8; column 2, line 31 to column 3,
line 14.) Hari further teaches that suitable plasticizers
include, inter alia, chlorinated paraffins and that paraffins
may be added in an amount of 0.05-5% by wt. in the binder (A)-
(E) as a customary or conventional additive. (Column 4, lines
58.)
Thus, the following table compares the subject matter of
appealed claim 1 and the disclosure of Hari.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007