Ex Parte Parks et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2005-0407                                                        
          Application No. 09/888,246                                                  
          prior to oven aging is from about 12.5 to about 17.5                        
          (specification, page 19, paragraph 0073).4                                  
               The examiner argues that “[t]he motivation to obtain a wet             
          cake having low bromine content is based on the teachings of the            
          prior art of an improvement in the color characteristics of the             
          product and the production of highly thermally stable products”             
          (answer, page 4).  Mack, however, is silent as to occluded free             
          bromine content, and the examiner has not provided evidence that            
          it was known in the art that occluded free bromine yellows or               
          hinders the thermal stability of brominated diphenylethanes.                
               The examiner argues that “[b]ased on the teaching of the               
          prior art of the use of chelating, complexing agent etc. and                
          examples 2-4, the skilled artisan would have the reasonable                 
          expectation that the wet cake of the prior art would have similar           
          occluded bromine content as those recited by the instant claims”            
          (answer, page 4).  As set forth above, until Mack’s exemplified             
          products are roasted they do not have yellowness indexes that are           
          comparable to those of the product in the appellants’ wet cake.             
          Mack’s exemplified products that are dried but not roasted, which           
          are more indicative of the products in the wet cake than are the            

               4 The yellowness indexes of both Mack and the appellants               
          were obtained according to ASTM D 1925 (Mack, col. 11, lines 4-6;           
          appellants’ specification, page 19, paragraph 0073).                        
                                          4                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007