Appeal No. 2005-0425
Application No. 09/887,144
appellants’ arguments beginning at page 14 of the principal brief
on appeal and the substance of the arguments at pages 3 and 4 of
the reply brief are persuasive. As such, we reverse the
rejection of claim 18 and its dependent claims 19 through 21.
In view of the foregoing, we have sustained the rejection of
claims 17, 25, 26 and 30 through 32, but have reversed the
rejection of dependent claims 18 through 21. Accordingly, the
decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007