The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KUNIO IKUI and YOICHI MATSUBARA ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0430 Application No. 09/817,2411 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before LEVY, SAADAT and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-6. Claims 1 and 7 have been canceled. We affirm. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed generally to a display apparatus capable of preventing the occurrence of electrostatic charges and leakage of electromagnetic fields on its display screen. According to Appellants, in order to suppress the 1 Application for patent filed March 27, 2001 which claims the foreign filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of the Japanese Application No. P2000-108978, filed April 11, 2000.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007