Ex Parte Behl - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0460                                                        
          Application No. 09/775,881                                                  

                    a carrier for holding a hard disk drive, the carrier              
               being removably mountable in a memory storage device                   
               housing; and                                                           
                    fins mounted on the carrier.                                      
               19. A device for removably mounting a hard disk drive in a             
          memory storage housing, comprising:                                         
                    a first means for holding a hard disk drive, the first            
               means being removably mountable in the memory storage device           
               housing; and                                                           
                    a second means for convective cooling mounted on the              
               first means.                                                           
               The examiner relies upon the following references in the               
          rejection of the appealed claims:                                           
          Ende                      4,642,715                 Feb. 10, 1987           
          Wyler                     5,510,954                 Apr. 23, 1996           
          Lin                       5,514,036                 May   7, 1996           
          Chang                     5,694,290                 Dec.  2, 1997           
          Grouell                   5,892,655                 Apr.  6, 1999           
               Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 13, 14, 17 and 18-20 stand rejected under           
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Chang.  The claims on            
          appeal also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as follows:             
               (a) claims 3, 4, 15 and 16 over Chang in view of Lin;                  
               (b) claims 7 and 8 over Chang in view of Wyler or Ende; and            
               (c) claims 9-12 over Chang in view of Wyler and Lin.                   
               Appellant submits at page 4 of the Brief that "[a]ll claims            
          at issue stand or fall together."  Accordingly, the claims as               


                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007