Ex Parte Dykstra et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication in a law journal                 
               and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                           Ex parte ROBERT RICHARD DYKSTRA                            
                                         and                                          
                                 LON MONTGOMERY GRAY                                  
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2005-0467                                  
                             Application No. 10/217,278                               
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     
          Before KIMLIN, KRATZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-8,              
          10-20 and 22-30.  Claims 9 and 21, the other claims pending in              
          the present application, have been allowed by the examiner.  A              
          copy of illustrative claim 1 is appended to this decision.                  



                                         -1-                                          



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007