Ex Parte Richardson et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          




                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                     ____________                                                       
                         Ex parte JEFF RICHARDSON, JON A. PETTY and E. TAL EHLERS                                       
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-0469                                                   
                                               Application No. 10/093,994                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before MCQUADE, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-5 and                 
              20.  Claims 6-12, 15, 17 and 18, the only other claims pending in this application, stand                 
              allowed.                                                                                                  
                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellants’ invention relates to a zero-sum tiling game comprising a plurality                 
              of “domino-like” tiles or game pieces, each having two substantially equally sized                        
              halves, with each half being provided with zero, one, two or three indicia.  The indicia                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007