The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte TERRY L. RENKEN and MATTHEW W. FORKNER _____________ Appeal No. 2005-0515 Application No. 10/124,925 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-5, 11 and 12. The subject matter on appeal relates to a catalyst which consists essentially of nickel, copper and chromium and wherein the improvement comprises the further inclusion of tin in the catalyst. This appealed subject matter is adequately represented by independent claim 1 which reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007