Appeal No. 2005-0538 Application No. 09/815,030 In view of the above, we affirm the anticipation rejection of claim 1. Conclusion The 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claim 1 as being anticipated by Floyd is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(effective September 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) )BOARD OF PATENT ) APPEALS AND PETER F. KRATZ ) INTERFERENCES Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) BAP/sld 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007