Appeal No. 2005-0562
Application 09/824,276
However, such an arrangement would clearly not result in a
transmission assembly like that defined in the claims before us
on appeal.
Since we have determined that the teachings and suggestions
which would have been fairly derived from the Reynolds and Jones
patents would not have made the subject matter as a whole of
claims 11, 13 through 16 and 19 through 27 on appeal obvious to
one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of appellants’
invention, we must refuse to sustain the examiner’s rejection of
those claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007