The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT J. RIESENMAN
and MICHAEL N. DERR
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0627
Application No. 09/749,432
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 30. In an Amendment
After Final (paper number 11), claims 1 and 91 were amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for fetching data for a first
device, storing the fetched data for the first device in a data buffer shared by a plurality of
1 Inasmuch as the indefiniteness rejection of claims 1 and 9 was not repeated in the answer, it is
assumed that the amendment had the effect of overcoming the rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007