The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PAUL E. JOHNSON ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0644 Application No. 09/804,522 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, DIXON, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 20. The disclosed invention relates to the use of an LED illumination source device in a flow particle detection device. An optical element collects nearly all of the light from the LED, and concentrates the collected light at a selected volume within a flow sample stream. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007