Ex Parte Carbin et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0646                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 10/278,184                                                  

          Representative claim 15 is reproduced as follows:                           
          15.    A printed circuit heater formed by a process comprising              
               the steps of:                                                          
          a) depositing a thin metal or metal alloy layer onto a surface of           
          a metal carrier foil, which thin metal or metal alloy layer has a           
          thickness of about 0.1 :m to about 2 :m, thereby forming a                  
          composite;                                                                  
          b) attaching the composite to a substrate such that the thin                
          metal or metal alloy layer is in contact with the substrate,                
          thereby forming a laminate;                                                 
          c) selectively removing at least a portion of the metal carrier             
          foil from portions of the laminate; and                                     
          d) patterning and etching the thin metal or metal alloy layer               
          such that the etched thin metal layer has a heat density of from            
          about 0.5 watts/in2 to about 20 watts/in2 at voltages from about            
          3 volts to about 600 volts.                                                 
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Sato et al. (Sato)            4,882,455          Nov. 21, 1989              
          Lindblom et al. (Lindblom)    5,038,132          Aug. 06, 1991              
          Lee et al. (Lee)              6,194,990          Feb. 27, 2001              
          Teshima et al. (Teshima)      6,457,632          Oct. 01, 2002              
          Claims 15-18 and 23-28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                       
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Lee.  Claims             
          19-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                      
          unpatentable over the teachings of Lee in view of Sato, Teshima             
          or Lindblom.                                                                
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007