Appeal No. 2005-0657 Application No. 10/136,984 provide adequate mixing and fusing/reacting of feed components to produce the cement clinker, regardless of the entry point of the slag. See Young, col. 4, ll. 16-22, and col. 5, ll. 32-35; and Oates, col. 3, ll. 8-29, and col. 6, ll. 2-10. For the foregoing reasons, we determine that the claimed subject matter would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in this art at the time of appellants’ invention. As noted by the examiner (Answer, pages 6 and 8-10), appellants have not provided any substantive evidence of unexpected results. Based on the totality of the record, including due consideration of appellants’ arguments, we determine that the preponderance of evidence weighs most heavily in favor of obviousness within the meaning of section 103(a). Accordingly, we affirm the examiner’s rejections of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Young alone or in view of Oates. 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007