Appeal No. 2005-0715 Application No. 09/725,428 between Rossin’s catalytic oxidizing step and his caustic scrubbing step. Because such a first detector measuring location does not satisfy the corresponding first detector measuring requirement of appealed claim 1, the examiner’s rejection is improper for this reason alone. It follows that we cannot sustain the Section 103 rejection of all appealed claims as being unpatentable over Rossin in view of Kisters and Tom. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY T. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) BRG:hh 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007