Ex Parte Riccardi - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-0722                                                        
          Application No. 09/749,361                                                  
          September 24, 2004) for the respective positions of the appellant           
          and the examiner regarding the merits of this rejection.1                   

                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               Mylaeus discloses an apparatus for singling sheets from a              
          stack 10 disposed on a supporting plate 22.  The apparatus                  
          includes a feed device comprising back and front cam wheels 30              
          and 40 associated with respective driving wheels 31 and 41 and              
          friction belts 33 and 45 for feeding the bottom sheet 11 in the             
          stack in a first transport direction T, an aligning device                  
          comprising cam wheels 50 associated with respective driving                 
          wheels 51 and friction belts 55 for feeding the bottom sheet in a           
          second alignment direction A orthogonal to the first direction              
          toward a base plate 20, a single cam wheel drive 60 for                     
          continuously driving the cam wheels 30, 40 and 50, and a device             
          for picking the bottom sheet from the stack when it is properly             
          aligned against the base plate.  Axles 32, 42 and 52 located                

               1 The record contains a copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,267,372 to           
          Mylaeus et al. which is the U.S. equivalent of the Mylaeus                  
          international application.  As the appellant (see page 2 in the             
          main brief) and the examiner (see page 3 in the answer) have                
          relied on the U.S. patent as an English language translation of             
          the international application, we shall do the same.  Hence, all            
          references in this decision to specific portions of the Mylaeus             
          disclosure will be to the U.S. patent which, it should be noted,            
          is itself prior art with respect to the appellant’s invention               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e).                                                   
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007