Appeal No. 2005-0743
Application No. 09/351,723
rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 including one relying upon Schier and
Kanevsky in a formally stated rejection. The examiner should also consider
the utilization of any other prior art including the Schalk patent mentioned
as part of the prior art at specification pages 2 and 3 and the prior art
inferences at specification pages 13 and 14.
-11-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007