Ex Parte Giraldi - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-0765                                                                       2               
              Application No. 09/844,989                                                                                 


                     The claimed invention is directed to a golf club with a toe end and a heel end                      
              wherein the loft angle configuration continuously varies from a positive loft angle to a                   
              negative loft angle.  The golf club head further includes a non-metallic insert in at least a              
              portion of the face surface.                                                                               
                     The claimed invention may be further understood with reference to the appealed                      
              claims appended to the appellant’s brief.                                                                  
                     The references of record relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                 
              obviousness are:                                                                                           
              MacKeil                            5,098,103                           Mar. 24, 1992                       
              Viollaz et al. (Viollaz)           5,310,185                           May 10, 1994                        
              Turner                             5,322,285                           Jun. 21, 1994                       
              Stuff                              5,505,450                           Apr.   9, 1996                      
              Werner et al. (Werner)             6,319,150                           Nov. 20, 2001                       
                                                                                     (filed May 25, 1999)                
                     Claims 1-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Stuff in                      
              view of Turner and MacKeil.                                                                                
                     Claims 10, 15, 20 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable                       
              over Stuff in view of Turner, MacKeil, Viollaz and Werner.                                                 
                     The details of these rejections can be had by reference to the examiner’s                           
              answer.  Appellant’s response to these rejections may be reviewed with reference to the                    
              appeal brief.                                                                                              










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007