The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WON BANG, YEN KUN WANG, and YEH JEN KAO
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-0786
Application No. 09/832,168
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CAROFF, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative
Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-11 and 17-21. Claims 12-16, all the other
claims in appellants’ application, stand withdrawn from further
consideration, pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b), as being drawn to a
non-elected invention and, thus, are not before us.
The claims on appeal relate to an apparatus for delivering
process gas from a vaporizer to a processing system. According
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007