Ex Parte Shimomura et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0805                                                         
          Application No. 10/234,097                                                   
                    means for processing the sample ion, said                          
               processing means guiding the sample ion into a magnetic                 
               field or an electric field for separating the ion                       
               according to a mass number to obtain a mass spectrum                    
               for analysis.                                                           
               In addition to the admitted prior art, the examiner relies              
          upon the following references as evidence of obviousness:                    
               Shiokawa            5,916,388            Jun. 29, 1999                  
               “Stainless Steels”, Marks’ Standard Handbook for                        
               Mechanical Engineers 10th Edition, pgs. 6-32 - 6-37                     
               (1996).  Section by James D. Redmond.  (Redmond)                        
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a mass                     
          spectrometer for analyzing a sample gas comprising a stainless               
          steel electrode that is baked at a temperature in the range of               
          200oC to 700oC and reconditioned by baking at a temperature in               
          the same range.  The initial baking of the stainless steel                   
          oxidizes the surface to produce chromium dioxide and chromium                
          oxide which reduces pinholes, while the reconditioning baking                
          removes components of the sample gas which contaminate the                   
          surface.                                                                     
               Appealed claims 1-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)             
          as being unpatentable over the admitted prior art in view of                 
          Redmond and Shiokawa.                                                        



                                          2                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007