Ex Parte Murti et al - Page 2



            Appeal No. 2005-0817                                                                       
            Application No. 10/167,683                                                                 

                  The examiner relies upon the following references as                                 
            evidence of obviousness:                                                                   
            Nakamura et al.                     5,405,725                  Apr. 11, 1995               
            (Nakamura)                                                                                 
            Chambers et al.                     5,876,887                  Mar.  2, 1999               
            (Chambers)                                                                                 
            Dimitrakopoulos et al.              5,946,551                  Aug. 31, 1999               
            (Dimitrakopoulos)                                                                          
            Wolk et al.                         6,410,201 B2               Jun. 25, 2002               
            (Wolk)                                               (filed Jul. 24, 2001)                 
            Yang                                US 2002/0135039 A1         Sep. 26, 2002               
            (Patent Application Publication)                      (filed May 17, 2002)                 
                  Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a process for                           
            forming a semiconductor layer by solution coating a dispersion                             
            comprising a solvent and a binder resin in a continuous phase and                          
            a disperse phase comprising an organic semiconductor material.                             
            The formed semiconductor layer is part of a micro-electronic                               
            device or a nano-electronic device.                                                        
                  The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                          
            as follows:                                                                                
                  (a) claims 1-9 over Nakamura in view of Wolk,                                        
                  (b) claim 10 over Nakamura in view of Wolk and Chambers,                             
                  (c) claim 11 over Nakamura in view of Wolk and Yang,                                 
                  (d) claims 12-14 over Dimitrakopoulos in view of Nakamura                            
            and Wolk.                                                                                  
                  Appellants submit at page 5 of the Brief that "[f]or each of                         
            the rejections, the claims do not stand or fall together."                                 
                                                 -2-                                                   



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007