Appeal No. 2005-0825 Application 08/772,259 The examiner relies on the following references: Ishikawa et al. (Ishikawa) 5,600,455 Feb. 4, 1997 (filed Aug. 31, 1994) The admitted prior art set forth in appellants’ application. Claims 4-7 and 9-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers the admitted prior art in view of Ishikawa. Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof. OPINION We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’ arguments set forth in the briefs along with the examiner’s rationale in support of the rejection and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the examiner’s answer. It is our view, after consideration of the record before us, that the evidence relied upon and the level of skill in the particular art would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in -3-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007