Appeal No. 2005-0845
Application 10/249,204
are newly rejected in the examiner’s answer. All other rejections
have been dropped by the examiner in the examiner’s answer.
The claimed invention is directed to a fishing lure which
when towed or retrieved through the water oscillates or swings at
the end of the fishing line and is made to dive into and raise
out of the water. The lure also has apertures at the rear end in
which air trapped in the lure bubbles out of the lure attracting
fish.
The claimed subject matter may be further understood with
reference to the appealed claims appended to appellant’s brief.
The reference of record relied upon by the examiner as
evidence of anticipation is:
Davis 4,881,340 Nov. 21, 1989
The Rejections
Claims 2, 4, 5, 7, 10 through 12, 21 through 23, 25 and 27
through 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by
Davis.
Claim 26 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph as indefinite.
For the full details of these rejections reference is made
to the examiner’s answer. For the full details of appellant’s
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007