Appeal No. 2005-0899 Application No. 10/058,520 Page 7 CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Rizzi and to reject claims 1-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Volpenhein is reversed. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) PFK/sldPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007