Ex Parte Williams et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                        __________                                                            

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                        __________                                                            
                                             Ex parte JAMES W. WILLIAMS,                                                      
                                      ANITA CHONG and  W. JAMES WALDMAN                                                       
                                                        __________                                                            
                                                  Appeal No. 2005-0902                                                        
                                                Application No. 09/529,053                                                    
                                                        __________                                                            
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                        __________                                                            
              Before ELLIS, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
              GRIMES,  Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                            
              rejection of claims 16-25, all of the claims remaining.  Claims 16, 22, and 25 are                              
              representative and read as follows:                                                                             
                      16.  A method for inhibiting viral replication in cells susceptible to viral                            
                      infection comprising contacting said cells with a leflunomide product in an                             
                      amount effective to inhibit viral virion assembly.                                                      
                      22.  The method of claim 16 further comprising contacting the cells with                                
                      another anti-viral agent.                                                                               
                      25.  The method of claim 16 wherein cells are virally infected.                                         








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007