Ex Parte Araki et al - Page 2


               Appeal No. 2005-0931                                                                                                  
               Application 10/006,679                                                                                                

               0.12 α y α 0.20) on a substrate by a physical deposition method while controlling a temperature                       
               of the front side of said substrate within a range of ± 2°C.                                                          
                       The reference relied on by the examiner is:                                                                   
               Araki et al. (Araki)                          5,676,998                             Oct. 14, 1997                   
                       The examiner has rejected appealed claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                 
               anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious over Araki                           
               (answer, pages 3-4).                                                                                                  
                       Appellants state that the appealed claims “stand or fall together” (brief, page 3).  Thus,                    
               we decide this appeal based on appealed claim 1.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) (2003); see also 37 CFR                        
               § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (effective September 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004);                               
               1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)).                                                                   
                       We affirm.                                                                                                    
                       Rather than reiterate the respective positions advanced by the examiner and appellants,                       
               we refer to the answer and to the brief for a complete exposition thereof.                                            
                                                              Opinion                                                                
                       We have carefully reviewed the record on this appeal and based thereon find ourselves in                      
               agreement with the supported finding advanced by the examiner that as a matter of fact, prima                         
               facie, appealed claim 1 is anticipated by or is obvious over Araki.  We add the following to the                      
               examiner’s analysis for emphasis.                                                                                     
                       It is apparent from the plain language of claim 1 taken in light of the specification,                        
               including the drawings, as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in this art, see In re                    
               Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054-55, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re Zletz, 893 F.2d                          
               319, 321-22, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989), that the same is couched in product-by-                           
               process format wherein the product is claimed in terms of the characteristics imparted by the                         
               stated process by which it is made, thus encompassing a product having such imparted                                  
               characteristics even if prepared by a different process.  See generally, In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d                       
               695, 697, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985).  Thus, the claimed RxM1-x-yBy thin film magnet                          
               encompassed by claim 1 has each Nd2Fe14B type crystalline phase isolated from another such                            
               phase by any manner of amorphous phase, with the c-axis of the crystalline phase oriented in a                        
               film-thickness direction, that is, oriented perpendicular to the film plane, and the film can be                      

                                                                - 2 -                                                                



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007