Ex Parte Siegel - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-0934                                                                 Page 2                
              Application No. 10/414,060                                                                                 



                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellant's invention relates generally to an umbrella improvement which                        
              facilitates on a rainy day an umbrella-assisted departure from a vehicle.  Claim 1 reads                   
              as follows:                                                                                                
                            For an umbrella in the use of which said umbrella in an open condition is                    
                     used during departure of an individual with packages through an open door of an                     
                     automobile on a rainy day, the improvement comprising attaching a bottom end                        
                     of a handle of said open umbrella to a top edge of said open door bounding a                        
                     window of said door to provide an operative attached position of said umbrella to                   
                     said top edge bounding said door window providing standing room for said                            
                     departing individual beneath said umbrella, operative positions of both hands of                    
                     said departing individual engaged about said packages during departure through                      
                     said open door, and one hand of said individual removed from said engaged                           
                     operative position about said packages and assuming an operative position in                        
                     contact with and disengaging said handle bottom end from said top edge of said                      
                     door, whereby said disengaged umbrella has use value in maintaining said                            
                     individual and packages dry during said departure from said automobile.                             


                     The rejections under appeal as set forth in the final rejection are as follows:                     
                            Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being                          
                     indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter            
                     which applicant regards as the invention.                                                           
                            Claim 1 is indefinite because:                                                               
                            1) The claim starts with the language "For an umbrella'' yet nothing is                      
                     claimed that is for an umbrella.                                                                    
                            2) lt is unclear if the claim is meant to be a structural claim or a method                  
                     claim. The body of the claim appears to be a method claim, but this is not set                      
                     forth in the preamble. The claim is structured more like a paragraph than a claim.                  
                            3) It is not clear if the applicant intends on claiming the car door as part of              
                     the present invention since the applicant has included more structure for the car                   
                     door.                                                                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007