Appeal No. 2005-0944
Application No. 09/941,377
contaminate an area around the target.
3. An apparatus for distributing a scented
chemical composition for hunting animals, the
apparatus comprising:
a pressurized dispenser for pressure based
dispensing; and
a foam string dispensed by the dispenser, the
foam string including the scented chemical composition
for hunting.
9. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the
chemical composition comprises a chemical composition
that masks human scent.
The examiner relies on the following prior art references
as evidence of unpatentability:
Cox et al. 3,705,669 Dec. 12, 1972
(Cox)
Easley 4,771,563 Sep. 20, 1988
Konietzki 4,788,787 Dec. 6, 1988
Claims 1 through 6, 11 through 14, and 16 through 20 on
appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable
over Cox in view of Konietzki. (Answer at 3-4.)
Correspondingly, dependent claims 7 through 10 on appeal stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Cox in
view of Konietzki, as applied to claim 1, and further in view of
Easley. (Id. at 4.)
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007