Appeal No. 2005-0960
Application No. 10/053,166
with argument or evidence of nonobviousness. We hereby sustain,
therefore, the examiner’s Section 103 rejection of all appealed
claims as being unpatentable over Hert in view of Fujii. See In
re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d, 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir.
1992).
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
WILLIAM F. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JEFFREY T. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BRG:hh
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007