Appeal No. 2005-0961
Application No. 09/990,787
consistent with the appellants’ specification for the reasons
detailed with respect to appealed claim 1.
In light of the foregoing and for the reasons expressed in
the answer, we hereby sustain the examiner’s section 102
rejection of all appealed claims as being anticipated by Chen.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
William F. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
Bradley R. Garris ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
Jeffrey T. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007