The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MARC SEGHATOL ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0966 Application No. 09/897,317 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 6, 13, 14 and 16, all of the claims remaining in this application. Claims 7 through 12, 15 and 17 through 28 have been cancelled. As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant’s invention relates to a hand- held microwave system for intra-oral dentistry that utilizes microwave energy to cure polymer materials intra-orally to produce dental composites having improved physical characteristics, and also utilizes microwave energy to detect the presence of and toPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007