Ex Parte Seghatol - Page 1




                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                



                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                             

                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                          
                                                  Ex parte MARC SEGHATOL                                                         
                                                           ____________                                                          
                                                     Appeal No. 2005-0966                                                        
                                                  Application No. 09/897,317                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                          
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                           ____________                                                          
               Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
               FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1                               
               through 6, 13, 14 and 16, all of the claims remaining in this application.  Claims 7                              
               through 12, 15 and 17 through 28 have been cancelled.                                                             


                      As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant’s invention relates to a hand-                          
               held microwave system for intra-oral dentistry that utilizes microwave energy to cure                             
               polymer materials intra-orally to produce dental composites having improved physical                              
               characteristics, and also utilizes microwave energy to detect the presence of and to                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007