Ex Parte Pauly et al - Page 2


                Appeal No. 2005-0976                                                   Page 2                  
                Application No. 10/203,228                                                                     

                          (a) an extract of Waltheria indica; and                                              
                          (b) an acid component selected from the group consisting of ascorbic                 
                             acid, ferulic acid, kojic acid and mixtures thereof.                              
                      The examiner relies upon the following references:                                       
                Bartolone et al. (Bartolone)    6,153,177           Nov. 28, 2000                              
                Pauly et al. (Pauly)                  6,406,720           Jun. 18, 2002                       
                      Claims 5-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious                     
                over the combination of Pauly and Bartolone.  After careful review of the record               
                and consideration of the issue before us, we reverse.                                          
                                                DISCUSSION                                                     
                      Pauly is relied upon for teaching “a cosmetic composition that contains                  
                Waltheria indica (see claims).  The cosmetics whiten the skin by inhibiting                    
                tyrosinase (see Table 1, columns 11 and 12).”  Examiner’s Answer, page 3.                      
                Bartolone is relied upon for teaching the use kojic acid, ferulic acid and ascorbic            
                acid to whiten the skin, and for teaching that the inhibition of tyrosinase whitens            
                the skin by inhibiting the formation of melanin.  See id.                                      
                      According to the rejection:                                                              
                             These references show that it was well known in the art at                        
                      the time of the invention to use the claimed ingredients in cosmetic                     
                      whitening compositions.  It is well known that it is prima facie                         
                      obvious to combine two or more ingredients each of which is taught                       
                      by the prior art to be useful for the same purpose in order to form a                    
                      third composition which is useful for the same purpose. . . .                            
                             Based on the disclosure by these references that these                            
                      substances are used in cosmetic skin whitening compositions, an                          
                      artisan of ordinary skill would have a reasonable expectation that a                     
                      combination of the substances would also be useful in creating                           
                      cosmetic skin whitening compositions.  Therefore, the artisan would                      
                      have been motivated to combine the claimed ingredients into a                            
                      single composition.  No patentable invention resides in combining                        
                      old ingredients of known properties where the results obtained                           
                      thereby are no more than the additive effect of the ingredients.                         
                Id. at 3-4 (citations omitted).                                                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007