Ex Parte Seidita - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0987                                                        
          Application No. 09/946,049                                                  

          beverages” (specification, page 1).  Representative claim 11                
          reads as follows:1                                                          
               11.  A packaging assembly, comprising:                                 
                    a container having a threaded finish portion; and                 
                    a closure cap mounted on said threaded finish portion             
               of said container, said closure cap comprising an upper                
               portion and a generally cylindrical sidewall depending                 
               downwardly from said upper portion, said cylindrical                   
               sidewall defining a threaded inner surface that is mated               
               with said threaded finish portion, and wherein said                    
               cylindrical sidewall further has an outer surface that is              
               stylized to resemble a conventional crown closure.                     
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 11, 13 through 20 and 22 through 28 stand rejected              
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent No.            
          5,715,959 to Pfefferkorn et al. (Pfefferkorn).                              
               Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over Pfefferkorn.                                              
               Attention is directed to the brief (filed September 13,                
          2004) and answer (mailed November 4, 2004) for the respective               
          positions of the appellant and examiner regarding the merits of             
          these rejections.                                                           

               1 With regard to claims 19 and 28, the underlying                      
          specification and drawings would seem to indicate that the                  
          references in these claims to the “respective outer ends” should            
          instead be to the --respective lower ends--.                                
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007