The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WOLFGANG MATTHES, LUTZ RICHTER and ANDREAS STEINERT ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0996 Application No. 09/848,583 ____________ HEARD: JUNE 8, 2005 ____________ Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10, 12 and 13. Claim 11 stands withdrawn from consideration as not being directed to an elected invention. BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to a cutting device for trimming margins of products, in particular, stitched or otherwise joined-together sheets of paper, the cutting device having a transport device and first drive mechanism for driving the transport device, a lifting device for moving knives for performing the margin trim and a secondPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007