Ex Parte Matthes et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          



                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                      ____________                                                       
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                      ____________                                                       
                    Ex parte WOLFGANG MATTHES, LUTZ RICHTER and ANDREAS STEINERT                                         
                                                      ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-0996                                                    
                                               Application No. 09/848,583                                                
                                                      ____________                                                       
                                                 HEARD: JUNE 8, 2005                                                     
                                                      ____________                                                       
              Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         



                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10, 12                 
              and 13.  Claim 11 stands withdrawn from consideration as not being directed to an                          
              elected invention.                                                                                         
                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellants’ invention relates to a cutting device for trimming margins of                       
              products, in particular, stitched or otherwise joined-together sheets of paper, the cutting                
              device having a transport device and first drive mechanism for driving the transport                       
              device, a lifting device for moving knives for performing the margin trim and a second                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007