Appeal No. 2005-1004 7
Application No. 09/656,333
As the examiner’s application of Munker does not cure the
foregoing deficiencies of Schaede relative to parent claim 1, we
also shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection
of dependent claim 11 as being unpatentable over Schaede in view
of Munker.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner:
a) to reject claims 7 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, is affirmed;
b) to reject claims 1, 2, 8 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as being anticipated by Schaede is reversed; and
c) to reject claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Schaede in view of Munker is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007