Appeal No. 2005-1083 Application No. 09/950,642 Thus, we determine that the evidence of obviousness, on balance, outweighs the evidence of unobviousness proffered by the appellant. Accordingly, we affirm the examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under Section 103. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CKP/hh 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007