Ex Parte Chopra et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                                                     
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       

                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
            Ex parte NAVEEN CHOPRA, PETER M. KAZMAIER, PAUL F. SMITH,                 
                                 and PAUL J. GERROIR                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2005-1087                                  
                             Application No. 10/175,587                               
                                     __________                                       
                                     ON BRIEF                                         
                                     __________                                       

          Before GARRIS, WARREN, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 11-16.           
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a composition                  
          comprising a plurality of microcapsules each including a                    
          polymerized micelle shell encapsulating a liquid droplet and a              
          particle component.  This appealed subject matter is adequately             
          illustrated by independent claim 11 which reads as follows:                 
                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007