The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte UWE HEITMANN, SONKE HORN, NIKOLAOS GEORGITSIS,
HEINZ-CHRISTEN LORENZEN, STEFFEN ROCKTASCHEL, STEPHAN WOLFF,
WOLFGANG STEINIGER, GERD STROHECKER, ANDREAS RINKE,
and HANS-HERBERT SCHMIDT
__________
Appeal No. 2005-1093
Application No. 10/058,200
____________
HEARD: June 7, 2005
____________
Before PATE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 90 to 96,
98 to 101, 104 to 109, 112, 113, and 115 to 117, which are all of the claims pending in
this application. Claims 1 to 66 have been canceled. Claims 67 to 89 are allowable and
claims 97, 102, 103, 110, 111, and 114 are objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all
of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007