The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHANDRIKA KASTURI, MARK E. WANDSTRAT, and BRIAN X. SONG
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1104
Application No. 09/795,211
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 1 through 17 as amended subsequent to the
final rejection (see the amendment dated May 12, 2003, entered as
per the Advisory Action dated May 29, 2003).1 Claims 1-17 are the
only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1
1The final rejection of claims 1-17 under the second
paragraph of section 112 has been withdrawn in view of this
amendment.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007