Appeal No. 2005-1115
Application 09/269,369
As a consequence, we hereby reverse the examiner’s
§ 103 rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 7, 11 and 12 as being
unpatentable over Jackson taken with Kinsey. Because the
deficiencies of these references are not supplied by the
additionally applied Vretman reference, we also hereby reverse
the examiner’s § 103 rejection of claims 5 and 13 as being
unpatentable over Jackson, Kinsey and Vretman.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007