The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ERIC W. HAUCK and WINSTON G. WALKER ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1123 Application No. 10/062,921 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 2-4, 6-8, 15-19 and 21-23. Claims 9-13 were canceled by amendment subsequent to the final rejection. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007