Ex Parte Hauck et al - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                                                                                                   Paper No. 21               

                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                        ____________                                                          
                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                        ____________                                                          
                                  Ex parte ERIC W. HAUCK and WINSTON G. WALKER                                                
                                                        ____________                                                          
                                                    Appeal No. 2005-1123                                                      
                                                 Application No. 10/062,921                                                   
                                                        ____________                                                          
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                          
              Before FRANKFORT, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                              



                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                      This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 2-4, 6-8,                    
              15-19 and 21-23.  Claims 9-13 were canceled by amendment subsequent to the final                                
              rejection.                                                                                                      
                      We AFFIRM.                                                                                              











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007