Appeal No. 2005-1125 2 Application No. 10/144,328 a resilient stop pad fitted concentrically to the piston rod, an end cap fitted to the container tube, said end cap being pressed onto the container tube by the resilient stop pad when the piston rod is moved into the container tube, and a sheath tube fitted to said stop pad and to said end cap, said sheath tube having at least one elastic fold and covering said piston rod between said stop pad and said end cap, said sheath tube, said resilient stop pad, and said end cap being formed as separate parts and assembled to form a preassembled unit which can stand independently of said piston rod and said container tube. THE PRIOR ART The references relied on by the examiner to support the final rejection are: Fotino et al. 5,901,947 May 11, 1999 (Fotino) McCormick et al. 6,199,844 Mar. 13, 2001 (McCormick) Handke et al, 196 41 728 Apr. 16, 1998 German Patent Document (Handke) Fichtel & Sachs Co., 91 09 020.2 Nov. 28, 1991 German Patent Document (Fichtel) THE REJECTIONS Claims 1, 6 through 8 and 11 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over McCormick in view of Fotino.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007