Ex Parte Ruf et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         


                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                          
                                    ____________                                      
                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                             
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte WOLFGANG RUF,                                
                            KONSTATIN FENKL and HANS LOSER                            
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2005-1130                                 
                              Application No. 10/072,876                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                  HEARD: June 8, 2005                                 
                                     ____________                                     
          Before KIMLIN, OWENS, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1-53, which are              
          all of the pending claims.                                                  
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a lamella of a headbox of a fibrous               
          material web production machine, and claim a headbox including              
          the lamella.  Claim 1, which claims the lamella, is illustrative:           
               1. A lamella of a headbox through which at least one fibrous           
          suspension flows, the headbox having a machine-width headbox                
          nozzle with a nozzle length and an exit opening, and the headbox            
          nozzle being delimited by an upper nozzle wall and a lower nozzle           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007