The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte BRANDON DUNCAN, JOSHUA SETH HODAS, JARED JOSEPH JACKSON, WALTER IRWIN NISSEN, III and NEELAKANTAN SUNDARESAN _____________ Appeal No. 2005-1157 Application No. 09/829,249 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 31. In an Amendment After Final, claims 21 through 31 were canceled. Accordingly, claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 20 remain before us on appeal. The disclosed invention relates to an electronic book device that processes a graphics input and an audio input to produce a graphics output and an audio output.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007