The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CHARLES R. SPERRY, NEIL E. RICE, JR. and SUZANNE SCOTT ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1159 Application No. 09/760,189 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4- 11 and 13-20. Claims 3 and 12 have been canceled. We REVERSE. BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to fluid dispensers and related apparatus used to produce on-demand foam-in-place packaging cushions and, more particularly, to an improved system for delivering cleaning solvent to certain portions of such fluid dispensers that are particularly susceptible to occlusion due to build-up and hardeningPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007