Appeal No. 2005-1209 Application No. 10/078,086 (claim 4) be designed to convert a stream of water to a two phase mixture of water and steam by using heat generated by the combustion of fuel cell anode exhaust gas in a catalytic burner. We find no reference in Kaufmann regarding the conversion of a stream of water to a two phase mixture of water and steam. At most, Kaufmann (page 3, para. 46) suggests that heat generated by the combustion of anode exhaust gas in a catalytic burner can be used in a heat exchanger “for evaporating operating medium and/or water, and/or for reforming the operating medium.” In no sense can this be taken as synonymous with the generation of a two phase mixture of water and steam in the heat exchanger. Evaporation of water does not necessarily imply that the water is converted to steam. Further, as explained by appellants, neither the turbine 7 nor the fan 5 disclosed in Kaufmann contains water and, therefore, can not be said to have anything to do with converting water into a two phase mixture of water and steam. Moreover, with regard to claim 4, we find nothing in Kaufmann to suggest feeding steam which has been so generated to a catalytic fuel reformer. With regard to dependent claim 7, we also note that Kaufmann makes no reference to providing “a swirled mixture of air and 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007