The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GERALD R. KOEFELDA and DONALD L. BELL ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1237 Application No. 10/227,631 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before MCQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Gerald R. Koefelda et al. originally took this appeal from the final rejection (mailed November 3, 2003) of claims 4 through 7, 11 through 16, 18 through 24 and 26 through 38.1 As the examiner has since withdrawn the rejections of claims 15 and 16, the appeal as to these claims is hereby dismissed, leaving for review the standing rejections of claims 4 through 7, 11 through 14, 18 through 24 and 26 through 38. Claims 15 and 16, as well as claim 25, now stand objected to as depending from rejected 1 Claims 17, 29, 31 and 32 have been amended subsequent to final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007