The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ACHIM SCHMITT ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1242 Application No. 09/242,014 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before McQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (mailed May 14, 2003) of claims 1 and 6 to 9. Claims 2 to 5 and 10 were canceled prior to the final rejection. On page 2, of the brief (filed July 3, 2003), the appellants state "[c]laims 6-9 are cancelled. Claim 1 is being appealed." Accordingly, the appeal with respect to claims 6 to 9 is dismissed. Claim 1 remains on appeal. We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007