Ex Parte SCHMITT - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   



                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                           Ex parte ACHIM SCHMITT                                              
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2005-1242                                              
                                           Application No. 09/242,014                                          
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                 ____________                                                  
             Before McQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
             NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (mailed May 14,            
             2003) of claims 1 and 6 to 9.  Claims 2 to 5 and 10 were canceled prior to the final              
             rejection.  On page 2, of the brief (filed July 3, 2003), the appellants state "[c]laims 6-9      
             are cancelled.  Claim 1 is being appealed."  Accordingly, the appeal with respect to              
             claims 6 to 9 is dismissed.  Claim 1 remains on appeal.                                           


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007