Appeal No. 2005-1266 10
Application No. 10/227,755
Thus, as applied by the examiner, Rosi does not disclose,
either expressly or inherently, each and every element of the
method recited in claim 11. Accordingly, we shall not sustain
the standing 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of claim 11 as being
anticipated by Rosi.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 8
and 11 is affirmed with respect to claims 1 through 8 and
reversed with respect to claim 11.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007